[pox-dev] Abandoning version numbers

[Shabbir Ahmed]

wooooo really?


On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccauley at gmail.com
> wrote:

> All right; I'm overruled. :)
> I've bumped betta's version to 0.1.0.  A truly momentous occasion, right?
>
> -- Murphy
>
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Shabbir Ahmed wrote:
>
> i vote for version number
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sam Russell <sam.h.russell at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I like version numbers - if POX were ever to be productised, it would
>> need minor patches, so it'd always need some provision for minor version
>> numbers. Ubuntu has cool names, but each one corresponds to a version number
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Murphy McCauley <
>> murphy.mccauley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Currently, POX has a version number (which has been at 0.0.0 since the
>>> beginning of time).
>>>
>>> I think the time is coming when we should either increment it, or we
>>> should kill it and just go by branch name.  I am leaning towards the latter
>>> since obviously there is no meaningful version numbering going on anyway.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> -- Murphy
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noxrepo.org/pipermail/pox-dev-noxrepo.org/attachments/20130216/3593475a/attachment-0002.htm>