[pox-dev] Abandoning version numbers

[Murphy McCauley]

All right; I'm overruled. :)
I've bumped betta's version to 0.1.0.  A truly momentous occasion, right?

-- Murphy

On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Shabbir Ahmed wrote:

> i vote for version number 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sam Russell <sam.h.russell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I like version numbers - if POX were ever to be productised, it would need minor patches, so it'd always need some provision for minor version numbers. Ubuntu has cool names, but each one corresponds to a version number
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccauley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently, POX has a version number (which has been at 0.0.0 since the beginning of time).
> 
> I think the time is coming when we should either increment it, or we should kill it and just go by branch name.  I am leaning towards the latter since obviously there is no meaningful version numbering going on anyway.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -- Murphy
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noxrepo.org/pipermail/pox-dev-noxrepo.org/attachments/20130215/74aaab8c/attachment-0002.htm>