[pox-dev] sending packets on all ports of the controller
durga
c.vijaya.durga at gmail.com
Tue Nov 19 22:21:55 PST 2013
<seems my earlier message was too large with images>
I had to try couple of times to replicate the issue. It is OFP-OFP-ARP and
both packet-outs are carrying arp replies. I will recheck my program.
Cheers!
Durga
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Murphy McCauley
<murphy.mccauley at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:04 PM, durga <c.vijaya.durga at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> reserved port OFPP_FLOOD floods on all ports of the switch, is there any
> such port to which a controller can flood on all connections made to
> itself???
>
> currently I tried sending ports on each connection using the
> dpid:connection map as below
>
>
> for aconnection in self.connections.values():
> if event.connection !=
> aconnection:#to avoid sending the pkt on incoming port
> aconnection.send(msg)
>
> I am trying to implement proxy ARP(thanks to thread started by Muhammad)
> and am trying to make the controller flood the arpreq on all its
> connections incase of no entry , rather than instructing the switch to
> flood.
>
> as of now I can see that controller is responding to both h3 and h1 with
> arp responses, but the table itself is built by sw1 flooding the initial
> arp req
>
> <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 1.55.01 pm.png>
>
>
> For starters, is 190 really screwy? Is it actually a packet-out
> containing a packet-out which contains an ARP? Because that doesn't sound
> right!
>
> -- Murphy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noxrepo.org/pipermail/pox-dev-noxrepo.org/attachments/20131120/49db65e5/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the pox-dev
mailing list